Moonee Valley Transfer Station
A transfer station nine kilometres from the Melbourne CBD recovers 45 to 47% of everything through the gate, across 21 recycling streams, with four staff. Published by Sustainability Victoria in July 2016 as one of five case studies alongside its Guide to Better Practice at Resource Recovery Centres. Rawtec produced this case study in collaboration with Sustainability Victoria.
Summary published
A metropolitan transfer station nine kilometres from the Melbourne CBD recovers an estimated 45 to 47% of everything that comes through the gate, running 21 recycling streams with four staff.
Customers sort their loads before they arrive.
Recyclables are free, general waste is charged, and the “Sort and Save” campaign tells people why it is worth separating the trailer load in the driveway.
Estimated recovery rate
Recycling streams accepted
Council staff required to run it
Years in operation at publication
How a metro site gets to 47%
Tonnages, pricing and the Sort and Save campaign
In 2014–15 the site handled 2,689 tonnes to landfill and 2,282 tonnes recycled.
Recyclables are accepted at no charge while general waste attracts a fee, with a lower rate for pensioners. Gate fees are assessed at the gatehouse on vehicle volume, load type, how much recyclable material is present and how well the load is already separated.
The campaign “encourages customers to pre-sort and drop off their waste and recyclables”. It reduces contamination.
Layout, and what is still missing
Customers follow a single one-way drive-through with drop-off points in sequence, past a sawtooth bin arrangement for bulk waste. Plant and machinery are separated from customer areas with a spotter supervising.
The document names timber and wood waste as the material still being landfilled and the obvious next separation.
An onsite resale shop is wanted, but the site has no room for one.
What the operators credit
Council management support for expanding the number of recycling streams is listed first.
Ease of use with clear signage for each individual stream, so a customer who has never been before can still get it right.
Prioritising customer service and site cleanliness, on the basis that a tidy site is a safe site when the public are driving through it.
Regularly reviewing emerging recycling options and market pricing, so the stream list stays cost-effective as commodity prices move.
The recovery rate is stated as an estimate of between 45 and 47%, not a measured figure, and the site has no weighbridge-based diversion reporting in the document. Population served, opening hours and site area are not stated.
The rest of the series
Four more Victorian facilities and the guide behind the series.
The case study lists all 21 free recyclable streams and the materials the site will not accept.
Planning a facility upgrade?
Most facility projects start with someone who already knows the site needs to change and needs the evidence to get it funded. If that is you, we would like to hear from you.