Case study · Resource recovery facilities · August 2016

Mount Scobie (Kyabram) Transfer Station

A $748,400 rebuild at Mount Scobie cut the Shire of Campaspe’s landfill tonnage by 18%, from about 1,100 tonnes a year to about 900. Published by Sustainability Victoria in August 2016 as one of five case studies alongside its Guide to Better Practice at Resource Recovery Centres. Rawtec produced this case study in collaboration with Sustainability Victoria.

Summary published

A $748,400 rebuild in the Shire of Campaspe cut landfill tonnage from about 1,100 tonnes a year to about 900. That is an 18% reduction, and roughly 200 tonnes a year now recycled instead of buried.

It is the only case study in the series with a before-and-after tonnage.

The build itself took three months. Planning took from August 2014 to completion in November 2015.

18%

Reduction in waste to landfill

200 t

Extra material recycled each year

$748,400

Total project cost

22

Recycling streams accepted

What changed

Landfill down, recycling up, and who paid

Approximately 1,100 tonnes a year went to landfill before the upgrade and about 900 tonnes after. Commingled recyclables rose 4% overall. The site serves an estimated population of 13,000.

Of the $748,400 total, Sustainability Victoria contributed $206,890. The rest was the Shire of Campaspe’s.

Twenty-two streams, one operator and a shed for the weather

The site is owned by the Shire of Campaspe and operated under contract by Ellwaste with a single employee per shift. Recyclables go to a materials recovery facility partnership at Echuca.

A large concrete-floored shed with the gatehouse inside it was built for a remote, weather-exposed site. A sawtooth platform takes the skip bins; stillages handle the smaller streams.

Designed for over-capacity, and opening hours

The stated lesson is to design for over-capacity. Extensive planning and design phases are essential, and the site should be built past current demand.

8:00am to 12:00pm Tuesday to Friday, and 8:00am to 3:45pm on Saturdays and Sundays. Weekend hours are more than double weekday hours, because that is when the public brings trailer loads.

What they want to add next

SOFT PLASTICS AND POLYSTYRENE

Both named as the next streams, subject to markets existing for them.

A WEIGHBRIDGE

Without one, the tonnage figures in this case study remain estimates.

EDUCATION AND DISPLAY AREAS

Space to show the public what happens to material after it leaves.

COVERS FOR THE SKIP BINS

A wind and rain control, and the same issue Anglesea and Wycheproof both raised independently.

Tonnages are stated in the source as approximations — “approximately 1,100”, “approximately 900”, “an estimated 200 tonnes” — and the site had no weighbridge at the time of publication.

The case study lists all 22 streams and the materials excluded, including the 300 millimetre limit on logs and stumps.

Planning a facility upgrade?

Most facility projects start with someone who already knows the site needs to change and needs the evidence to get it funded. If that is you, we would like to hear from you.